Classical Languages - Latin - Syntax - Subordinate Clauses - Conditionals

Conditionals
If Clauses and Results

Conditionals

A conditional sentence has two parts: the protasis, the clause that states the condition (if he comes), and the apodosis, the clause that states the result (I shall be glad). Latin classifies conditions by their time and by their degree of reality, and the mood and tense of the two verbs follow from the type. This page sets out the six main types, the mixed conditions, the conjunctions sī, nisi, sīn, sī nōn, nisi forte, quodsī, the way conditions are reported in indirect speech, and the relation of the conditional to the proviso and to the concessive clause. The overview of the clause types is on the page Subordinate clauses.

Conjunctions

Conjunction Meaning Example (constructed) Translation
sī if Sī vēnit, gaudeō. If he has come, I am glad.
nisi, nī if not, unless, except if Nisi vēneris, tristis erō. Unless you come, I shall be sad.
sī nōn if not (the negative goes with one word or sets up a contrast) Sī nōn omnēs, at multī vēnērunt. If not all, at least many came.
sīn but if Sī vēnit, gaudeō; sīn nōn vēnit, tristis sum. If he has come, I am glad; but if he has not, I am sad.
nisi forte unless perhaps Nisi forte errō, hoc vērum est. Unless I am perhaps mistaken, this is true.
quodsī and if, but if (connecting) Quodsī hoc vērum est, errāvimus. But if this is true, we have erred.
sī minus if not (the verb is omitted) Veniet, sī minus, mittet. He will come; if not, he will send.
  1. nisi negates the whole condition and means except if, and it is the usual word for unless. nī is the archaic form, found in early Latin and in formulas.
  2. sī nōn negates a single word, or sets up a contrast with at or tamen.
  3. After sī, nisi, nē and num the indefinite pronoun is quis, qua, quid, not aliquis: sī quis if anyone, nisi quid unless something.
  4. sī can also introduce an indirect question after verbs of trying and waiting: Experiar sī possim. I shall try to see whether I can. (constructed)

Six types

Type Protasis Apodosis Example (constructed) Translation
1. Simple, present sī + present indicative present indicative Sī hoc dīcis, errās. If you say this, you are wrong.
2. Simple, past sī + perfect indicative perfect indicative Sī hoc dīxistī, errāvistī. If you said this, you were wrong.
3. Future more vivid sī + future or future perfect indicative future indicative Sī hoc dīxeris, errābis. If you say this, you will be wrong.
4. Future less vivid sī + present subjunctive present subjunctive Sī hoc dīcās, errēs. If you were to say this, you would be wrong.
5. Contrary to fact, present sī + imperfect subjunctive imperfect subjunctive Sī adesset, gaudērem. If he were here, I should be glad.
6. Contrary to fact, past sī + pluperfect subjunctive pluperfect subjunctive Sī adfuisset, gāvīsus essem. If he had been here, I should have been glad.

Simple conditions (types 1 and 2)

A simple condition states a fact without saying whether the condition is true. Both verbs are in the indicative, in any tense, and the tense is the same as in English.

Sī qua recordantī benefacta priōra voluptās est hominī ...

If a man has any pleasure in recalling his former good deeds ... (Catullus 76.1–2; qua is the indefinite pronoun after sī)

Future conditions (types 3 and 4)

The future more vivid (sī vēneris, gaudēbō) treats the future condition as a real possibility, and uses the future or the future perfect where English has the present (see Tense, mood and voice in main clauses). The present indicative is also found in a vivid future condition:

Sī pereō, hominum manibus periisse iuvābit.

If I perish, it will be a pleasure to have perished at the hands of men. (Vergil, Aeneid 3.606; the present indicative pereō for the future)

The future less vivid (sī dīcās, errēs) treats the condition as a remote or imagined possibility, and has the present subjunctive in both clauses. The apodosis may have the future indicative in poetry:

Sī frāctus illābātur orbis, impavidum ferient ruīnae.

If the world should break and fall upon him, the ruins will strike him unafraid. (Horace, Odes 3.3.7–8; a present subjunctive protasis with a future indicative apodosis)

Contrary to fact (types 5 and 6)

A condition contrary to fact (or unreal) says that something is not the case, or was not the case. The imperfect subjunctive refers to the present and the pluperfect subjunctive to the past:

Time Subjunctive Example (constructed)
present imperfect Sī doctus esset, id nōn dīceret. If he were learned, he would not say this.
past pluperfect Sī doctus fuisset, id nōn dīxisset. If he had been learned, he would not have said this.

The tenses of an unreal condition are not changed by the sequence of tenses: the same forms follow any main verb.

Sī quis mihi parvulus aulā lūderet Aenēās ... nōn equidem omnīnō capta ac dēserta vidērer.

If only some little Aeneas were playing in my hall ... I should not seem so utterly captured and deserted. (Vergil, Aeneid 4.328–330, Dido speaking; both verbs are imperfect subjunctive)

Sī tacuissēs, philosophus mānsissēs.

If you had kept silent, you would have remained a philosopher. (Boethius, Consolation of Philosophy 2.7; both verbs are pluperfect subjunctive)

The indicative in the apodosis. Verbs of obligation, possibility and fitness (dēbeō, possum, oportet, and expressions such as longum erat, melius erat) stand in the indicative in the apodosis of an unreal condition, in the tense of the action that did not happen: Poteram īre, sī vellem. I could have gone, if I had wished. (constructed)

Mixed conditions

A condition may combine the two time references of an unreal condition:

Pattern Example (constructed) Translation
pluperfect protasis, imperfect apodosis (past cause, present result) Sī Caesar victus esset, nunc līberī essēmus. If Caesar had been defeated, we should now be free.
imperfect protasis, pluperfect apodosis (a standing condition, a past result) Sī doctus essem, id nōn dīxissem. If I were learned, I should not have said this.

Sī Pergama dextrā dēfendī possent, etiam hāc dēfēnsa fuissent.

If Troy could have been defended by a right hand, it would have been defended by this one too. (Vergil, Aeneid 2.291–292; an imperfect subjunctive protasis and a pluperfect subjunctive apodosis)

General conditions

A general (or iterative) condition describes what happens whenever a condition is met. The indicative is used in both clauses:

Time Protasis Apodosis Example (constructed) Translation
present present or perfect indicative present indicative Sī quis vēnit, accipitur. If anyone comes, he is received.
past pluperfect indicative imperfect indicative Sī quis vēnerat, accipiēbātur. If anyone came, he was received.

Conditions in indirect speech

When a conditional sentence is reported, the apodosis becomes an infinitive and the protasis a subjunctive:

Direct Reported (constructed)
Sī hoc facit, errat. Dīcit, sī hoc faciat, eum errāre. / Dīxit, sī hoc faceret, eum errāre.
Sī hoc fēcerit, errābit. Dīcit, sī hoc fēcerit, eum errātūrum esse. / Dīxit, sī hoc fēcisset, eum errātūrum esse.
Sī adesset, gaudērem. Dīxit, sī adesset, sē gāvīsūrum fuisse.
Sī adfuisset, gāvīsus essem. Dīxit, sī adfuisset, sē gāvīsūrum fuisse.
  1. The protasis is always in the subjunctive; its tense follows the sequence, except that the unreal tenses are unchanged.
  2. The apodosis is an infinitive: the present infinitive for a simple present, the future infinitive for a future condition, and the periphrasis -ūrum fuisse for a contrary-to-fact condition, whether present or past.
  3. The full treatment is on the page Indirect speech.

Conditional relative clauses and proviso

  1. Conditional relative clauses. A relative clause can contain a condition. It follows the rules of the types: Quī hoc facit, errat. Whoever does this is wrong (equivalent to sī quis hoc facit). (constructed)

  2. Proviso. dum, modo and dummodo (provided that) take the subjunctive, with nē as the negative: Dummodo nē tardē veniās, tē exspectābō. I shall wait for you, provided that you do not come late. (constructed)

    Ōderint dum metuant.

    Let them hate, provided that they fear. (Accius, quoted by Suetonius, Caligula 30)

Conditions and concessions compared

A concession (although) grants a fact, and a concessive-conditional (even if) grants a supposition. The moods follow:

Conjunction Mood Example (constructed) Translation
quamquam indicative (a fact) Quamquam fessus est, labōrat. Although he is tired, he works.
quamvīs, licet subjunctive Quamvīs sit dīves, miser est. However rich he may be, he is wretched.
etsī, etiamsī as for sī: indicative or subjunctive Etsī labōrat, gaudet. Etiamsī labōret, gaudeat. Even though he works, he is glad. Even if he were to work, he would be glad.
cum subjunctive Cum sit dīves, miser est. Although he is rich, he is wretched.

See also the page Subordinate clauses.

Summary

Type Protasis Apodosis
Simple present sī + present indicative present indicative
Simple past sī + perfect indicative perfect indicative
Future more vivid sī + future or future perfect indicative future indicative
Future less vivid sī + present subjunctive present subjunctive
Contrary to fact, present sī + imperfect subjunctive imperfect subjunctive
Contrary to fact, past sī + pluperfect subjunctive pluperfect subjunctive
General, present sī + present or perfect indicative present indicative
General, past sī + pluperfect indicative imperfect indicative

Parsing practice

Identify the type of condition and translate.

  1. sī hoc dīcis, errās
  2. sī vēneris, gaudēbō
  3. sī hoc dīcās, errēs
  4. sī adesset, gaudērem
  5. sī adfuisset, gāvīsus essem
  6. sī quis mihi parvulus aulā lūderet Aenēās (Vergil, Aeneid 4.328–329)
  7. sī frāctus illābātur orbis (Horace, Odes 3.3.7)
  8. sī pereō, hominum manibus periisse iuvābit (Vergil, Aeneid 3.606)
  9. sī tacuissēs, philosophus mānsissēs (Boethius, Consolation of Philosophy 2.7)
  10. sī Pergama dextrā dēfendī possent, etiam hāc dēfēnsa fuissent (Vergil, Aeneid 2.291–292)
  11. nisi forte errō
  12. quodsī hoc vērum est
  13. Dīxit, sī hoc fēcisset, eum errātūrum esse.
  14. Quī hoc facit, errat.

Answers

  1. Simple, present: if you say this, you are wrong.
  2. Future more vivid: if you come, I shall be glad (the future perfect for the English present).
  3. Future less vivid: if you were to say this, you would be wrong.
  4. Contrary to fact, present: if he were here, I should be glad.
  5. Contrary to fact, past: if he had been here, I should have been glad.
  6. Contrary to fact, present: if only some little Aeneas were playing in my hall.
  7. Future less vivid, protasis with the present subjunctive: if the world should break and fall.
  8. A vivid future condition with the present indicative: if I perish, it will be a pleasure to have perished at the hands of men.
  9. Contrary to fact, past: if you had kept silent, you would have remained a philosopher.
  10. Mixed: an imperfect subjunctive protasis (a present supposition) and a pluperfect subjunctive apodosis (a past result).
  11. nisi forte: unless perhaps.
  12. quodsī: but if, connecting with the preceding sentence.
  13. A reported future more vivid condition after a historic verb: the protasis in the pluperfect subjunctive, the apodosis in the future infinitive: he said that if he did this, he would be wrong.
  14. A conditional relative clause with the indicative: whoever does this is wrong.

Common pitfalls

  • Using the indicative for a condition contrary to fact. Both verbs are in the subjunctive: sī adesset, gaudērem.
  • Confusing the time of the unreal tenses. The imperfect refers to the present and the pluperfect to the past.
  • Using the present in a future condition. Latin has the future or the future perfect: sī vēneris.
  • Mixing the future less vivid and the unreal. sī dīcās, errēs is a remote future; sī dīceret, errāret is contrary to fact.
  • Applying the sequence of tenses to an unreal condition. The tenses do not change.
  • Writing aliquis after sī. It is sī quis.
  • Confusing nisi and sī nōn. nisi negates the whole condition; sī nōn negates one word or sets up a contrast.
  • Using sī for whether in an ordinary indirect question. Use num, -ne or utrum; sī appears only after verbs of trying and waiting.
  • Forgetting the periphrasis in indirect speech. The apodosis of an unreal condition becomes -ūrum fuisse.
  • Using the subjunctive in the apodosis after a verb of obligation or possibility. The indicative is used: poteram, dēbēbam.
  • Using nōn for a negative proviso. It is nē: dummodo nē ....

Self-test

  1. Name the two parts of a conditional sentence.
  2. Give the mood and tense of both clauses in a condition contrary to fact, present and past.
  3. Translate and classify: Sī hoc dīcās, errēs. Sī hoc dīxeris, errābis.
  4. Translate: Sī adesset, gaudērem. Sī adfuisset, gāvīsus essem.
  5. What is the difference between nisi and sī nōn?
  6. How do you say if anyone comes (sī with the indefinite pronoun)?
  7. How do you say I could have gone, if I had wished? What is unusual?
  8. How is the condition Sī adesset, gaudērem. reported after dīxit?
  9. Which of Vergil's two quotations in this page, Aeneid 2.291–292 and Aeneid 4.328–330, is mixed, and why?
  10. What mood follows dummodo and what is its negative?

Answers

  1. The protasis (the if clause) and the apodosis (the result clause).
  2. The imperfect subjunctive in both clauses for the present, and the pluperfect subjunctive in both clauses for the past.
  3. If you were to say this, you would be wrong (future less vivid); if you say this, you will be wrong (future more vivid).
  4. If he were here, I should be glad. If he had been here, I should have been glad.
  5. nisi negates the whole condition (unless); sī nōn negates a single word or sets up a contrast (if not ... at least).
  6. sī quis venit (or sī quis vēnerit for the future).
  7. Poteram īre, sī vellem. The apodosis is in the indicative because it contains a verb of possibility.
  8. Dīxit, sī adesset, sē gāvīsūrum fuisse.
  9. Aeneid 2.291–292 is mixed: the protasis is imperfect subjunctive (a present supposition) and the apodosis pluperfect subjunctive (a past result). Aeneid 4.328–330 is purely present contrary to fact.
  10. The subjunctive, and the negative is nē.

Go to the top of the page